Ad Terras Per Aspera

Dear Steve Jobs:

I’ve known of Apple since I was a child. One of the first computers I used was an Apple //e with it’s little monochrome screen. I’ve watched Macs come into the world, I’ve watched PowerMacs come into the world, and I’ve watched iPods and the new Macintels come into the world. I am now watching the iPhone take it’s first baby steps into the world. I have even written about Apple, both positive and negative, on my blog. Last but not least, I have seen people enjoy Apple products.

I’ve seen other companies fail where Apple managed to pull it off. I’ve seen Apple create new products that no one has produced before, or at least, didn’t get right before (the iPod wasn’t the first, but it was the first that actually got it right). And in my entire life, I’ve never owned an Apple product.

So, I’ve decided that I want to finally join the Cult of Mac and buy a Macbook Pro sometime in the next 6 months. Please release a model that contains the following items and/or features:

• LED-backlit LCD to improve power efficiency, lower heat output, increase color vibrancy and brightness, darken blacks, and increase contrast.
• Said LCD panel should be available in 1920×1080/1920×1200 resolution. I do not care if it is 15 or 17″, however manufacturers are currently shipping panels with that resolution in both sizes.
• Either Intel’s new solid state cache module, or a hard drive with built-in hybrid technology.
• A large 5400 or 4200rpm drive as an option, which in theory should boot faster than a 7200rpm drive without a solid state cache, yet use far less power, make less noise, and be less expensive.
• Intel’s new Santa Rosa platform.
• The option of 4 gigabytes or more of 800mhz RAM to go with said Santa Rosa Core 2 Duo.
• A WiFi chipset that can be software upgraded to spec-N when the 802.11N specification is finally released sometime next year; this does not, however, mean I want a new chipset if the current pre-N ones now shipping will work properly with spec-N.
• A 3D accelerator that, on a PC, could be described as DX10 compatible: Nvidia’s, ATI’s, or even Intel’s if their new DX10 chip doesn’t suck.
• Leopard.
• Even after all these features, I also want a total powered-by-battery time longer than the previous Macbook Pro model; however, this should be easier due to the backlight using less power, the CPU being able to idle more efficiently, and the optional slower drive using less power when spun up.

You may consider my request odd and specific, however I would like my first real Mac experience to be enjoyable and fruitful. Please consider my request.

However, do not misunderstand: this is not an ultimatum. Even if the Macbook Pros coming around the corner do not include all of these options, I will still consider one as my next laptop. I am simply giving you first chance at my business before everyone else gets a chance.

Signed,
        Patrick McFarland

So, everyone has noticed the CNET rumor mill bullshitting about Apple ditching IBM for Intel.

You can all stop laughing now; and for those that didn’t get the joke: Apple and IBM are an item. Apple has been using IBM processors since the switch to PowerPC all those years ago, and Apple will continue to be making Macs with PPCs in them until the end of the universe.

However, lets say Apple does get in bed with Intel, we have two choices. (I’m doubting this will happen, but lets humor the idea)

Behind door number one: Apple is secretly working on a new Newton handheld PDA, and wants to use Intel’s half-way decent XScale embedded CPU series, but continuing to use PPC on their desktops, workstations, servers, and laptops.

Behind door number two: Apple is secretly working on reviving Yellow Box (OpenStep for Windows), and wants to produce really cheap Yellow Box+Windows machines, and wants to use Intel x86 on the equivalent of an x86 Mac.

Now, I doubt number two will ever happen. Yellow Box/Windows is a very bad idea, and runs in the opposite direction OSX is going in; however, if Apple were to get their tendrils into Microsoft, Longhorn (often quoted as being Microsoft’s clone of OSX) might actually get released in my lifetime, and actually rock to boot. And if Windows would quit sucking, and inherit Yellow Box functionality, I’d quit hating Windows.

This, however, brings up GNUstep for Windows. If Windows ends up getting an up-to-date version of Yellow Box from Apple, GNUstep for Windows would not be required anymore as we would have OpenStep on Windows provided by the company who bought out NeXT; but it would also become a threat to Yellow Box.

Of course, being able to build OpenStep apps as native Windows ones is not something GNUstep can do, but Yellow Box will be able to do (and will have to do to avoid rejection and failure); this said, I’d even switch to Yellow Box (for building OpenStep apps on Windows) due to its superior integration efforts by the alternate reality Apple (led by Steve Jobs in a beard).

… So, wait, would that mean the alternate reality me runs Windows, because Linux is under a draconian license, and the Overlords Torvald and Stallman are trying to sue Microsoft (the last bastion of freedom in the world) into the ground?