<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CafePress Sucks Ass 2: Electric Boogaloo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo</link>
	<description>Transmissions from the Little Blue Marble</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: corey</title>
		<link>http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/comment-page-1#comment-134705</link>
		<dc:creator>corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 19:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/#comment-134705</guid>
		<description>CafePress SUCKS!!!  They charged my $4.95 for a premium market and then marked all of my images as &quot;under review&quot;.  I ended up doing a chargeback for the $4.95 which also made CafePRess to have to pay an additional $20 chargeback fee to Visa.  Ha!  TAKE THAT CAFEPRESS!!

So, if you want to hurt Cafepress, the best thing to so is to signup for a premium shop, add your content, and if you run into any problems whatsoever, chargeback the $4.95 and give CafePress a dise of its own medicine.  If a bunch of people do chargebcaks, we can put CafePress out of business for good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CafePress SUCKS!!!  They charged my $4.95 for a premium market and then marked all of my images as &#8220;under review&#8221;.  I ended up doing a chargeback for the $4.95 which also made CafePRess to have to pay an additional $20 chargeback fee to Visa.  Ha!  TAKE THAT CAFEPRESS!!</p>
<p>So, if you want to hurt Cafepress, the best thing to so is to signup for a premium shop, add your content, and if you run into any problems whatsoever, chargeback the $4.95 and give CafePress a dise of its own medicine.  If a bunch of people do chargebcaks, we can put CafePress out of business for good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walrus</title>
		<link>http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/comment-page-1#comment-131189</link>
		<dc:creator>Walrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/#comment-131189</guid>
		<description>In June 2009, CafePress began competing with the artists for whom it acts as printer and shipper.
 
CafePress rents web shops to its artists. The artist creates a website page and manually loads the desired blank products. The artist imports his image onto each product, arranges the products on the page, describes the products, titles the products and tags the images.
 
Initially, the artist would set a markup and received the markup for each product sold.
 
However, recently CafePress began competing with its artists, using the artists&#039; own images. CafePress created a marketplace where a customer can search a keyword. That search brings up artist products. When the customer buys from the marketplace CafePress pays the artist 10% of the price CafePress set. Both the customer and the artist lose money. If the artist&#039;s shop sells a t-shirt for $21, the artist makes $3.01. If the marketplace sells the same shirt for $25, the artist gets $2.50. The customer pays $4 more, and the artist gets $0.51 less. 
 
CafePress tells artists to &quot;promote your own shop,&quot; but CafePress buys Google adwords using the very image tags the artist provided. 
 
CafePress justifies this bait and switch of service terms by telling artists they can opt out if they don&#039;t like the new terms; however, many have spent as much as 7 or 8 years creating as many as 88000 images. 
 
In spite of their sweat-equity, many shopkeepers (content providers) are building shops at other print-on-demand companies and then closing their CafePress shops due to the broken faith and trust, the financial hardship CafePress has delivered into so many lives, and the huge amount of time and dedicated effort all lost in the momentum of their own businesses. Would you keep your AMOCO station franchise if AMOCO built a company store across the street from you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In June 2009, CafePress began competing with the artists for whom it acts as printer and shipper.</p>
<p>CafePress rents web shops to its artists. The artist creates a website page and manually loads the desired blank products. The artist imports his image onto each product, arranges the products on the page, describes the products, titles the products and tags the images.</p>
<p>Initially, the artist would set a markup and received the markup for each product sold.</p>
<p>However, recently CafePress began competing with its artists, using the artists&#8217; own images. CafePress created a marketplace where a customer can search a keyword. That search brings up artist products. When the customer buys from the marketplace CafePress pays the artist 10% of the price CafePress set. Both the customer and the artist lose money. If the artist&#8217;s shop sells a t-shirt for $21, the artist makes $3.01. If the marketplace sells the same shirt for $25, the artist gets $2.50. The customer pays $4 more, and the artist gets $0.51 less. </p>
<p>CafePress tells artists to &#8220;promote your own shop,&#8221; but CafePress buys Google adwords using the very image tags the artist provided. </p>
<p>CafePress justifies this bait and switch of service terms by telling artists they can opt out if they don&#8217;t like the new terms; however, many have spent as much as 7 or 8 years creating as many as 88000 images. </p>
<p>In spite of their sweat-equity, many shopkeepers (content providers) are building shops at other print-on-demand companies and then closing their CafePress shops due to the broken faith and trust, the financial hardship CafePress has delivered into so many lives, and the huge amount of time and dedicated effort all lost in the momentum of their own businesses. Would you keep your AMOCO station franchise if AMOCO built a company store across the street from you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: any non moose</title>
		<link>http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/comment-page-1#comment-123815</link>
		<dc:creator>any non moose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/#comment-123815</guid>
		<description> What year is this? 1993?

It is pitiful, I can&#039;t upload an image and have random net users print a poster reliably .. I can&#039;t search on a movie title and watch a movie online .. and about a decade back some &quot;kick arse anti-authority&quot; band called Metallica killed the one usable music service.

If there&#039;s no conspiracy, maybe there should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What year is this? 1993?</p>
<p>It is pitiful, I can&#8217;t upload an image and have random net users print a poster reliably .. I can&#8217;t search on a movie title and watch a movie online .. and about a decade back some &#8220;kick arse anti-authority&#8221; band called Metallica killed the one usable music service.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s no conspiracy, maybe there should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oazam</title>
		<link>http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/comment-page-1#comment-89046</link>
		<dc:creator>oazam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/#comment-89046</guid>
		<description>I am very disappointed with a black tshirt that had direct printing on it. there was ghosting on all the transparent areas and the colors are extremely muted. not at all like the preview before i ordered. anyone know of a place that does good custom tshirts on a black tee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very disappointed with a black tshirt that had direct printing on it. there was ghosting on all the transparent areas and the colors are extremely muted. not at all like the preview before i ordered. anyone know of a place that does good custom tshirts on a black tee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CharPaula</title>
		<link>http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/comment-page-1#comment-5870</link>
		<dc:creator>CharPaula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/#comment-5870</guid>
		<description>Another new contender is Printfection. They have a huge selection of colors including many darks
http://www.printfection.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another new contender is Printfection. They have a huge selection of colors including many darks<br />
<a href="http://www.printfection.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.printfection.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McFarland</title>
		<link>http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/comment-page-1#comment-4710</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/#comment-4710</guid>
		<description>Ahah! A new contender!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahah! A new contender!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cade</title>
		<link>http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/comment-page-1#comment-4702</link>
		<dc:creator>Cade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/#comment-4702</guid>
		<description>Came across your site somehow. You might want to give http://www.imagekind.com a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Came across your site somehow. You might want to give <a href="http://www.imagekind.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.imagekind.com</a> a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honey bunny</title>
		<link>http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/comment-page-1#comment-4143</link>
		<dc:creator>honey bunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/#comment-4143</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve had nothing but good luck with cafepress. zazzle, on the other hand, sucks ass. the only product they offer that has turned out consistant nice-quality images are the stamps. everything else is crap. i ordered some magnets with two of my designs on them. they didn&#039;t bleed one of them, so there was white space at the top and bottom and they didn&#039;t center the other one. i double checked my design/layout after I got the items in the mail and wouldn&#039;t you know it, everything looks perfect and i had everything sized correctly. they just don&#039;t take the time to care much about the output of their product. oh, and using DHL as their shipper is ridiculous, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve had nothing but good luck with cafepress. zazzle, on the other hand, sucks ass. the only product they offer that has turned out consistant nice-quality images are the stamps. everything else is crap. i ordered some magnets with two of my designs on them. they didn&#8217;t bleed one of them, so there was white space at the top and bottom and they didn&#8217;t center the other one. i double checked my design/layout after I got the items in the mail and wouldn&#8217;t you know it, everything looks perfect and i had everything sized correctly. they just don&#8217;t take the time to care much about the output of their product. oh, and using DHL as their shipper is ridiculous, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan pun</title>
		<link>http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/comment-page-1#comment-3014</link>
		<dc:creator>stan pun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 23:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/#comment-3014</guid>
		<description>I know Zazzle low DPI requirements sounds like a concern, but I ordered this one photo-illustration that i did and there was no pixellation or artifacting in the image at all. it was pretty nice.

I have washed one direct print Cafepress shirt so far,... inside out, and in warm temp, no dryer. Yes it did age a bit. Shoot, I have silk screen shirts that are 15 years old that still look pretty vibrant. I am surprised there aren&#039;t more complaints on the web.
Have not tried washing a black shirt yet.

I think they might have less fading with a cotton poly blend shirt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Zazzle low DPI requirements sounds like a concern, but I ordered this one photo-illustration that i did and there was no pixellation or artifacting in the image at all. it was pretty nice.</p>
<p>I have washed one direct print Cafepress shirt so far,&#8230; inside out, and in warm temp, no dryer. Yes it did age a bit. Shoot, I have silk screen shirts that are 15 years old that still look pretty vibrant. I am surprised there aren&#8217;t more complaints on the web.<br />
Have not tried washing a black shirt yet.</p>
<p>I think they might have less fading with a cotton poly blend shirt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McFarland</title>
		<link>http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/comment-page-1#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 23:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;d like to hear what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;d like to hear what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chaostheorem</title>
		<link>http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/comment-page-1#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>chaostheorem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 20:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/05/24/cafepress-sucks-ass-2-electric-boogaloo/#comment-374</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m about to give CafePress a try, because I don&#039;t have the resources to set up my own shop or deal with pre/post-sales processes, but still would like to offer merchandise to help re-establish a nearly dead brand (Blaster Master).

I&#039;ll post comments if anything comes up. If something does go wrong, I can try Zazzle and see what happens. I&#039;ve been watching CafePress for awhile, but have only heard one complaint (from MegaTokyo), but I can&#039;t recall what it was.

The only other self-publication site I&#039;ve seen besides the three you&#039;ve mentioned, is Lulu.com, but they don&#039;t appear to offer printing on clothing items or such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m about to give CafePress a try, because I don&#8217;t have the resources to set up my own shop or deal with pre/post-sales processes, but still would like to offer merchandise to help re-establish a nearly dead brand (Blaster Master).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll post comments if anything comes up. If something does go wrong, I can try Zazzle and see what happens. I&#8217;ve been watching CafePress for awhile, but have only heard one complaint (from MegaTokyo), but I can&#8217;t recall what it was.</p>
<p>The only other self-publication site I&#8217;ve seen besides the three you&#8217;ve mentioned, is Lulu.com, but they don&#8217;t appear to offer printing on clothing items or such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

